101PD SAMPLEPart I — Pleading, Service, and Motion Practice: the Current State §1 How to Use an Update Course An update course earns its hours differently than a doctrine course, and the reader deserves the method stated. What this course does: fixes the current state of California civil procedure's most-moved pieces — the discovery revolution of Part II being the decade's headline — with the changes' effective dates, their practice consequences, and the stable frameworks around them; what it cannot do: freeze a moving field, which is why every specific carries this course's standing instruction — verify current text before relying — and why the meta's flags mark the provisions most likely to have moved again by the time any given reader arrives. The reading strategy: each section states the framework (stable), the recent change (dated), and the practice adjustment (actionable) — and the Part III bench compresses the whole course into the deadline charts and drills a litigator actually consults. The honest frame for the update genre, in this catalog's tradition: the dangerous practitioner is not the one who missed a change but the one who is confident about a provision that moved — the update course's real product is calibrated confidence, meaning current knowledge plus the habit of checking, and both halves are the curriculum. §2 Service of Process — the Framework and the Coming Reform The framework, stable for decades: personal service as the preferred method; substituted service on a competent household member or apparent person-in-charge after reasonable diligence (the usual three attempts), with mailing and its ten-day completion rule; service by mail with acknowledgment; publication as the last resort on a proper showing; and the corporate channels through designated agents and officers. The change on the calendar: the SPARE Act (AB 747), effective January 1, 2027, rewrites the proof culture of personal and substituted service — requiring documented service attempts on different days and times, time-stamped photographic evidence and GPS data supporting proofs of service, registration disclosures for process servers, county registries, and expanded ability to challenge improper service — a legislative response to sewer-service abuses, and a compliance project for every litigation practice that serves anyone. The practice adjustments to begin now: engage process servers whose technology already produces the documentation the Act will require (the vendors moved before the statute); audit proof-of-service templates against the coming standards; calendar the effective date for a procedures review; and treat default judgments built on thin proofs as the Act's retroactive risk zone — the challenge-friendly regime will read old proofs with new eyes. The stable disciplines that never moved: the proof of service as a filed document with jurisdictional consequences, the quiet-title and default contexts where service defects surface years later, and the §1 method applied — framework, change, adjustment — which this section models for the rest of the course. §3 Pleading Practice — Demurrers, Amendments, and the Meet-and-Confer Culture The framework: California remains a fact-pleading jurisdiction — ultimate facts stating a cause of action, the demurrer